Tag Archive: Oxford University Press


OXFORD PUT IMMEDIACY BEFORE LOGIC

tears-of-joy-emojiQuestion : When is a word not a word?
Answer : When it’s a pictograph.

This is not a joke and it makes the  Oxford English Dictionary’s decision to name the ‘Face with Tears of Joy’ emoji as this year’s word of the year a very odd one indeed.

A more logical move would have been to give the title to ’emoji’ , a  word borrowed from Japanese to denote   ‘a small digital image or icon used to express an idea or emotion in electronic communication’.

The key word in this definition is ‘image‘. Unless Oxford University Press (OUP) have plans to turn their dictionary into a picture book it’s hard to fully understand the reasoning behind this.

Casper Grothwahl, the President of the Dictionaries Division highlights that these staples of teen texting culture have now entered the mainstream and therefore that there was a need to acknowledge what he calls this  “obsessively immediate” form of communication.

More and more reference books now exist primarily in a digital format with embedded videos and suchlike. This obviously reflects the way we consume information but a distinction should still be made between  language we use (i.e. words) and their visual equivalents.

Oxford Dictionary wants to be seen as an up to date resource rather than as a dusty repository of dead or dying language but I think they’ve made a dumb call here.

 

 

MY FIRST WEBINAR

Modern teachers face a bewildering array of technological options – finding which ones are effective is a big challenge.

Earl Stevick’s model for effective learning  advocates  concentrated, intuitive, onerous and rational teaching methods combined with kindness and understanding.

These principles require educators to look at learners as individuals rather than as an anonymous target group.

On the face of it,  distance learning via the internet cannot hope to meet these challenging demands but I came away from my first experience of a web-based seminar feeling quite positive about its potential as a resource to supplement traditional classroom methods.

These online presentations go under the hateful heading of  ‘webinars’, a portmanteau word I detest. The one I participated in was run by Oxford University Press  on the topic of teaching academic speaking skills to students learning English as a foreign language.

The experience was as interesting for the contributions of the other participants in the message board as it was for the input by the teacher. In a way I guess this mirrors how interactions work face to face – group dynamics are such that the student to student connection is often as vital as that between teacher and student.

It made me look critically at my teaching style and I realise I’d like to explore ways of being more of a facilitator than an instructor.

Have you participated in a ‘webinar‘?  If so, what were the pros and cons for you?

SEEING IS BELIEVING

FILM : A VERY SHORT INTRODUCTION by Michael Wood (Oxford University Press)

What can you say about the subject of film in 144 pages that hasn’t been said before?  Quite a lot, actually if you are Michael Wood, professor of comparative literature at Princeton University.

He brings a fresh gaze to what might otherwise be a tired subject and does so without being pompous or elitist. He recognises that movies can be works of art and say something profound about the human condition but ,equally, they have a role in providing what he calls “pure unimproving pleasure”.

He picks a quote from the Marx Brothers’ Duck Soup to illustrate how what we see in film plays on our perception of reality. In a scene where Chico and Harpo are both disguised as Groucho, Margaret Dumont sees one exit and can’t understand how the other ‘Groucho’ can still be in the room – “Who are you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?”, asks Chico.

Filmmakers play with such illusions and deceptions all the time to raise the conundrum that Wood poses: “you can know what you can’t see but you can’t see what you don’t know”.

Statements like this could easily have led down a dead-end of navel gazing, but Michael Wood isn’t in the business of making obscure philosophical statements for the hell of it.

At the heart of this book is a deep and enduring love of the medium since film can “endow lifeless things with life, or living things with a different life”.

He gives a brief overview of the origins and various definitions of film in all its forms and despite the demise of cinemas as movie palaces, he remains optimistic about the future.

We experience films in wholly different ways now and on this topic he quotes Jonathan Rosenbaum from his book Goodbye Cinema, Hello Cinephilia in identifying a new kind of viewers with “a love of films that doesn’t depend on the old experience of cinema”.

Through You Tube, Netflix, Mubi and countless other legal and illegal online resources we have the history of film at our disposal that has never been possible before. There are pros and cons to this that you could argue about until the cows come home but Wood prefers to end on a deliberately positive note : “Film, in its magical animating mode doesn’t define, fix or even represent anything, doesn’t capture, hold or freeze, it lets its objects run, lends them the life we thought they had lost; and shaped or ragged, it mixes what we remember with what we dream and offers us an image of movement that we often can’t quite believe and almost never can deny” .

In other words, memories and imagined worlds can become united by film ; this why the where, when and how we watch may change but the desire to see films will never die.

BLOGS REPLACE SIN

Techno savvy kids show the way

Techno savvy kids show the way

This is not a new story but it’s new to me.

Daniel Chamberlin of the struggling Arthur magazine alerted me to the interesting case of Oxford University Press  revamping their Junior Dictionary,  dumping (among other words) a small but significant batch of religious references.  These are:

“Abbey, aisle, altar, bishop, chapel, christen, disciple, minister, monastery, monk, nun, nunnery, parish, pew, psalm, pulpit, saint, sin, devil, vicar”

In their place they reach for techno-savvy kids with definitions of words such as:
“Blog, broadband, MP3 player, voicemail, attachment, database, export, chatroom, bullet point, cut and paste, analogue”.

As the Daily Telegraph reported in December 2008,  words connected with the countryside, the monarchy and British history have also been unceremoniously weeded out.

Chamberlin seems to lament the more city based culture this reflects  but it seems to me that OUP’s pragmatic and secular line is quite healthy.

We now await the wrath of The Pope!

IINTRODUCING ATHEISM

OUP short introductions

Julian Baggini

I can’t resist small books about big issues so was pleased to chance upon Julian Baggini’s ‘Atheism’ – number 99 in the Oxford University Press ‘a very short introduction’ series. You can find a Blog interview with Baggini on the OUP site devoted to these books.

Issues don’t come much bigger than the question ‘Is there a God?’ or I suppose a logical follow up question : ‘If there is no God what is the meaning of life?’

Continue reading