Tag Archive: Fundamentalism


EDUCATED by Tara Westover (Random House, 2018)
41qzuq2h2wl._sx327_bo1204203200_

What is education for?

This deceptively simple question is guaranteed to open a can of worms.

In Charles Dickens’ ‘Hard Times’, the severe school board superintendent Thomas Gradgrind expresses the view that “facts alone are wanted in life”. Schooling in Victorian times typically followed the view that young captives in the classroom were little more that vessels to be filled.

In our supposedly more enlightened age, decent-minded folk are scathing towards such blatant child abuse. The robotic process of memorizing and reproducing information is rightly dismissed in favor of an educational model that encourages students to, in the words of Noam Chomsky, “shape the questions worth pursuing”.

In a talk to teachers, James Baldwin followed the Chomskyan line when he said “The purpose of education is to create in a person the ability of to look at the world for himself”. But Baldwin was also aware of how problematic a well-informed, critical populace could be and added that “no society is really anxious to have that kind of person around”.

In ‘Educated’ by Tara Westover , the author implicitly asks readers to consider where instruction ends and indoctrination begins.

In a note to readers, she advises: “This is not a book about Mormonism. Neither is it a book about religious belief”. Yet the fundamentalist of her survivalist parents and their rigid application of principles prescribed by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints have a huge and primarily negative impact of her upbringing.

A weaker, less stubborn personality would have been broken and submitted to a conventional life mapped out for her. As it is, she not only survives to tell her remarkable tale but thrives against all odds to become an esteemed scholar and to exemplify the virtues of individual thought and creative enquiry. Continue reading →

IINTRODUCING ATHEISM

I can’t resist small books about big issues so was pleased to chance upon Julian Baggini’s ‘Atheism’ – number 99 in the Oxford University Press ‘a very short introduction’ series. You can find a Blog interview with Baggini on the OUP site devoted to these books.

Issues don’t come much bigger than the question ‘Is there a God?’ or I suppose a logical follow up question : ‘If there is no God what is the meaning of life?’

Baggini is less strident in his arguments than Richard Dawkins is in his excellent ‘The God Delusion’. His slightly softer approach is probably because he is concerned not to endorse what he called the tendency towards ‘Militant Atheism’ which becomes just another form of fundamentalism.

Ultimately what he is describing is a form of Humanism with tolerance and compassion at its heart .

Atheism is concerned with fact rather than faith and, he writes: “can be understood not simply as a denial of religion but as a self contained belief system”. In this way he distinguishes it from faith which he defines as a belief “in something which flies in the face of experience and evidence”

On the question of morality he states succinctly “being good is a challenge for everyone, atheist or non-atheist”.

As for the meaning of life he writes: “If the only point in living is to serve somebody else’s purposes then we cease to be valuable beings in our own right……..I find it hard to imagine why God would want to create creatures like us solely to serve him – it’s not as though he’s in need of domestic help or anything like that”.

If this sounds flippant, it’s worth pointing out that this position is quite close to that of eminent Church of England priest and scholar Don Cupitt who wrote that “Religion should be a guide for living, not a preparation for dying” ( After God)

Baggini makes a good case in a short space. If you are a believer – pick up a copy and read it with an open mind.

If you are not, read it anyway so you can feel smug about being right all along! 🙂