Tag Archive: Steve Reich


Tortoise live: this ain’t no disco

TORTOISE – Locomotic Club, Bologna 19th February 2016 

tortoise

It’s gonna rain? Tortoise are ready for all weathers.  L-R: John McEntire, Doug McCombs, John Herndon, Dan Bitney & Jeff Parker

“No moving lights please”. This is the polite but firm request made to lighting engineers by Tortoise’s Dan Bitney after the first song.

The message is clear; the beats may sometimes be danceable but this ain’t no disco.

But the question as to how exactly you do begin to categorize the music of Tortoise has been an ongoing challenge for the past 25 years of the Chicago band’s existence.

Calling it post-rock, as many still do, runs the risk of implying that the band are somehow opposed to conventional rock music. In an interview with The Wire in 2001 John McEntire said “As far as I’m concerned all we’ve ever been is a rock band” and on the strength of their brilliant sold out show at Bologna this is clearly still his position.

What makes them less conventional, and thus harder to pigeonhole, is that no-one sings and they are so clearly wide open to sounds and rhythms from other genres. Jazz is an obvious influence but there are also strong elements of funk, soul and R’n’B. Continue reading

SOUND, VISION AND SOFT TOYS

Transmissions VI festival in Ravenna  14th March 2013 – Teatro Rasi
Robert Aiki Aubrey Lowe (Lichens) + Charlemagne Palestine

Image from Lichens show at Ravenna

Edgard Varèse famously defined music as ‘organised sound’ and influential artists like Le Monte Young and John Cage staked their reputations on the belief that everything we hear can be classified as ‘music’.

This no limits philosophy was followed by the two American musicians who performed in Ravenna on the first day of the Transmissions Festival which follows a broad theme of transcendence. They belong to different generations but both refuse to be constrained by anything resembling conventional song structures.

Robert Aiki Aubrey Lowe

Chicago’s Robert Aiki Aubrey Lowe is perhaps easiest to classify as his electronica/ ambient works contain echoes of Bowie’s Berlin period (Low especially) and also reminded me of early Tangerine Dream albums like Phaedra or Rubycon.

He uses a delay pedal to build a one-man chorus of banshee-like falsetto mantras against a backdrop of electronic drones and digitally generated beats. This, one imagines, has a spiritual purpose yet suggests strange ritualistic rites rather than conventional religious ceremonies. During the 45-minute set, he is in semi darkness so, aside from the music, the focus is directed to a large screen which projects eye/fish-shaped images in garish psychedelic colours.

Charlemagne Palestine is harder to pigeonhole. Now in his late 60s, he is commonly spoken of in the same breath as his contemporaries like Steve Reich, Phillip Glass and Terry Riley. It’s easy to understand why after  he played what I took to be an abridged version of his  Strumming Music first recorded in 1974.  However, this eccentric show was more like a one-hour piece of performance art than a demonstration of minimalism.

Charlemagne Palestine adds soft toys to the stage set.

You knew it was going to be unusual from the fact that, before playing, he carefully decorated the stage with soft toys and scarves pulled from two red suitcases.

He began by walking around the auditorium making a high-pitched sound by rubbing his finger around a glass of cognac. To this he added some wordless moans. Then, on stage,  he held two teddy bears up to microphone for them to chant “We like to sing” in harmony, though they were very slightly out of synch.

Teatro Rasi is a 13th century building that used to be a church and with a mobile mic-headset Palestine wandered to the back of the stage to make full use of its ecclesiastical acoustics. The sub-human chant he produced sounded like something off David Lynch’s Crazy Clown Time.  The weird effect was compounded when he retrieved a dense mass of noise, containing indistinguishable voices, from his MacBook. He concluded with a similar out of synch trick, this time with two musical toys.

During all this no-one in the bemused audience seemed sure whether to clap or make a discreet exit and there was no applause until the very end.

It was one of the most bizarre performances I’ve ever witnessed though on reflection it perfectly exemplified  the definition of music as propounded by Varèse et al – while it looked chaotic, there was method, and organisation, within the madness.

“MOST MUSIC IS GARBAGE”

Steve Reich in an interview with The Guardian makes, what I think is an accurate summing up of the music scene:

“Look, most music throughout history is garbage. It could be Beethoven’s contemporaries, it could be the current top 40; you play in a garden, you get weeds. A lot of people who use computers are gonna come up with junk; most of the people who use notation came up with junk, too. But there are the Brian Enos – people who have imagination for a new way of working that fits with their intuitive gifts – that come up with great stuff. A few things will turn out to be enduring. Well made, and in a new way.”

ANIMATED REICH

Rich Batsford‘s  the album Valentine Court is no masterpiece but the ambient piano music on the shorter tracks works quite well and I like the fact you can ‘see’ the notes in the video to the track So Steve, a mini homage to the great Steve Reich. The visuals are made from the Music Animation Machine program

Link:

My review of Valentine Court (Whisperin’ & Hollerin’)

THE REST IS NOISE

I didn’t know how much I needed this book until I began reading it. I realise now that there was an enormous gap in my musical knowledge which Alex Ross’ brilliant study has helped to fill. By the end, he won me over to his central argument that “at the beginning of the 21st century, the impulse to pit classical music against pop culture no longer makes intellectual or emotional sense“.

One of the main strengths of the book is that Ross does not write from an elitist perspective. He is all too aware of the negative popular perception of classical music which means that it is “widely mocked as a stuck-up, sissified, intrinsically un-American pursuit“. At the same time he doesn’t argue that self appointed musical experts are always right : “Mainstream audiences may lag behind the intellectual classes in appreciating the more adventurous composers, but sometimes they are quicker to perceive the value of music that the politicians of style fail to comprehend“. It is this open minded, even handed approach that makes his description of  100 years of ‘difficult music’ so illuminating. Continue reading