Tag Archive: sam mendes


EMPIRE OF LIGHT directed by Sam Mendes (UK, 2022)

I’m trying to imagine Sam Mendes’ pitch to the producers for this movie.

It’s about coming to terms with ageing, loneliness, a women with mental health problems, sexual harassment at the workplace, the state of the British nation in 1980, living with racism, making meaningful life choices and nostalgia for the days when cinemas were seen as dream palaces  

A novice director would have been asked to go away and think which story he really wanted to tell.  Any one could have made for an interesting story but putting them all together results in what my Italian friend called a minestrone. She didn’t mean it as a compliment!

This is the first film Mendes has both written and directed. His track record as a director based on screenplays by others is impressive but here he is guilty of using far too many ingredients and hoping a tasty dish will be the outcome.

It’s all beautifully filmed by Roger Deakins and the actors do their level best but ultimately it’s clear they have been given more than can chew. The emphasis on gloss and sentiment renders any presentation of moral issues or social questions at best superficial , at worst embarrassingly simplistic.

Olivia Coleman as  Hilary Small  and Micheal Ward  as Stephen  make for an unlikely couple –  believable as friends but not as lovers. Their relationship and the Empire cinema in Margate where they work exist in a kind of bubble. 

It is all so quiet!  

This is 1980 but it is as if Covid lockdown regulations were in place.  At one point Hilary and Stephen take an empty bus to a deserted beach of the coastal town. In another scene , after Stephen is beaten up by a racist mob his mother, a nurse, seems to be only member of staff in the local hospital.

Where is everybody else?  

Perhaps the pandemic meant that the use of extras was problematic. There’s certainly never any danger of social distancing. Details like this matter because they render the improbable plot and questionable characterisation even more far-fetched. Mendes has plenty of theatrical experience and his story might conceivably have made a better stage play albeit without the homage to cinema-going.  

With so many spinning plates on the go, there’s a real problem of how to conclude the film. We are presented with a sequence of endings but none can provide a miracle salvation.  

Far from being served with a delicious soup, this movie is a dog’s dinner.   

SPECTRE directed by Sam Mendes (UK, 2015)

This movie is two and a half hours of pure Bond bunkum which starts promisingly but, unlike the superior Skyfall, is content to fall back on style over substance.

Daniel Craig with steely blue eyes and tight muscular body makes a good 007 and is as indestructible and unflappable as ever.

Realism is not the keynote of course but you would expect him to accrue a few designer scars or at least to get a few stains or rips in his clothes.

As it is, you cut him and he does not bleed, beat him and he does not bruise and he always gets the girl. Another unfathomable trick he pulls off is to be able to find an immaculate range of suits or elegant casual wear despite never carrying more than hand luggage.

His maverick mission is to crack Spectre (note the English spelling), a criminal organization which has infiltrated the heart of the British establishment with a cunning plan of using global surveillance via the Internet and wiretapping – sound familiar? Continue reading

JAMES BOND DRIVES BACK TO HIS ROOTS

SKYFALL directed by Sam Mendes (UK, 2012)

The final lo-tech half hour of this movie reminded of Christmas Day 1965,  a large part of which I spent looking for James Bond in my living room.

Continue reading

I’m a big fan of Dave Eggers; both of his writings and his role as founder of the independent publishing house McSweeney’s. However, I didn’t actually know that he and his wife, Vendela Vida had written the screenplay to Away We Go when I saw the movie. I was drawn to it more through the fact that it was directed by Sam Mendes.

Everything in the film hangs on how you feel about the couple, Burt (John Krasinski) and Verona (Maya Rudolph) who are expecting their first child.

Feeling dissatisfied with their current home, they embark on a journey in search of the perfect place to lay down roots and start a family. The friends and relatives they meet in Phoenix, Tucson, Madison, Montreal and Miami mostly give examples of what not to do.

Burt’s a bit of a nerd, Verona is a practical, down to earth type. They are compassionate pair who are determined to put humanity before consumerism. What they want is for their daughter to grow up in a positive environment. With such  laudable principles, they should be characters you feel like rooting for I ultimately found their niceness quite irritating.

Eventually they end up settling for Verona’s old family home so could have saved time and money on the road trip.

There’s no real tension in the story and a curious absence of passion. Insipid Nick Drake style songs of Scottish singer-songwriter Alexi Murdoch add to the flat texture.

In Italy the movie was released as American Life, a title that reflect the apparent aim of giving a snapshot of U.S. views pertaining to family life. Since what we see are largely caricatures I was none the wiser about what these attitudes might be and therefore was left wondering what the point of the movie was.

LOST REVOLUTIONARIES

REVOLUTIONARY ROAD directed by Sam Mendes (USA, 2008)

On ‘Lose Yourself’ Eminem rapped that we have just one shot – one opportunity. Fundamentally , this is also the premise upon which Richard Yate’s book and Sam Mendes’ movie is based.

It strikes me as simplistic –and a little depressing –  to argue that we have just a single make or break chance to find a fulfilling direction in our lives. We have to seize chances when they arise but I prefer to think  that these are not necessary one-off, make or break occasions.

In ‘Revolutionary Road ,  April Wheeler (played by Kate Winslet), decides that a move to Paris ,Europe is her one shot escape route. She dreams of starting afresh – replacing desperate housewifery for a life less ordinary.

She temporarily manages to persuade her sceptical hubby (Leonardo Di Caprio) but a tempting promotion offer and an unplanned pregnancy destroys the pipedream and, ultimately, their marriage.

Winslet was apparently blown away by Yates’ novel when she read it while she was expecting her first child to director Sam Mendes.

Mendes says that even if he wasn’t  married to her, she would have been first choice and it’s hard to argue against this. Winslet captures her character’s mood swings brilliantly .

This is more than can be said for Di Caprio. He has never convinced me that he is an actor with the physical stature or gravitas to portray such complex adult roles.

As Martin Scorsese’s blue-eyed boy some have likened Di Caprio  to De Niro but to me he’s more like the new Tom Hanks.  He plays parts efficiently but there’s never any sense that he is taking risks.

It’s still a good movie for all that,  largely because the claustrophobic world of  1950s suburbia is so perfectly evoked.  Sam Mendes is a major league director because he knows when to let images speak for themselves rather than diluting them with explanatory dialogue. The scenes of massed commuters and compartmentalised offices have a resonance akin to King Vidor’s silent classic ‘The Crowd’ while shots of April Wheeler doing household chores are enough to convey the barrenness of her life.