Tag Archive: Barack Obama


“One is rather fond of a whole lot of love”

One thing the Yanks do better than the Brits is to celebrate stars of stage and screen in style.

The tribute to Led Zeppelin at the Kennedy Center Awards was a case in point. It helps of course to have Obama in the White House. Any other US President would have sounded like he was simply reading a prepared speech – he gave the impression that he was a fan who knew what he was talking about.

Compare this to Robert Plant’s visit to Buckingham Palace in 2009 to collect a CBE where all he got was a formal handshake from stuffed shirt Prince Charles. Continue reading

A VOTE FOR ACTION

Well, “a-wop bop-a loo-mop, a-lop . OBAMA-boom!!!!!”

What a relief  to wake up to the news of Obama’s victory!

I really feared for the future of America and the world had Romney been elected.

Writer Dave Eggers and music manager Jordan Kurland , two guys originally from Chicago, set up a website to compile 90 Reasons why Americans voted for Barack – these included :  “Because this is an election with existential implications” (Paul Simon) ;  “Obama still has some respect for the truth” (John Sayles) and  “Thanks to President Obama, nearly 50 million American women have access to contraception and preventive health services” (Isabel Allande).

My personal favourite came from David Lynch who wrote : “I have noticed something in Mitt Romney’s name, which I think speaks to what he is about. If you just rearrange a few letters, Romney becomes R MONEY. I believe Mitt Romney wants to get his Mitts on R Money. He would like to get it and divide it up with his friends, the Big Money Bunch”.

In his acceptance speech, Obama was right to emphasise that the future of America depends a lot on self government – on people taking responsibility for their own actions. But they also rely on governments and politicians and Obama has the mandate to prove that politics is not just “a contest of egos or the domain of special interests”  but about helping, not hindering, ordinary people to realise their hopes and dreams.

In the last four years I think he has been too cautious – there’s nothing to be gained form being reckless but he now needs to take more risks and show that the vision of the truly United States of American so eloquently expressed in his victory speech in Chicago is more than just rhetoric.

The vote today  is as he said himself , “a vote for action”.

78483638_1382129285276953_4658151152183934976_n

Pagina 27 bookstore, Cesenatico, Italy

How would you define a bookworm?

Most dictionaries will tell you that it is someone who reads a lot but I think it means more than merely being an avid reader.

It isn’t just the love of books, it’s the thought that they are so fundamental to existence that without them you’d go insane or die or both.

The Italian translation is “topo di biblioteca” (a ‘library mouse’) which makes it sound like  part of a nasty rodent infestation or else a misanthrope who survives the trauma of the modern world by hiding away in the shelves and shadows of a public building.

These negative connotations are probably a reflection of those who brand these ‘worms’ as ‘freaks of nature’ with their noses forever in a book. “There’s more to life than books” they may think and often say, with the implication that the pen is not mightier than the sword but that actions speak louder than words.

A strong statement for the defence of ‘freaks’ came from Brother Mouzone in HBO’s The Wire when he pointed out that the most dangerous thing in America is “a nigger with a library card”.

For the nation’s leaders, an educated populace is a threat since the lower orders might get ideas above their station. George Orwell knew exactly what he was satirising when he turned the truism that knowledge is power on its head and invented the Big Brother slogan “ignorance is strength” for this is exactly the hegemony that the power brokers use to keep people in their place.

So if you have politicians that read, it’s good, right?

“Gee – you read good!”

Well, yes and no. Certainly, having the bright Barack Obama in the White House is more reassuring than the dumb George Bush.

There’s a famous shot of Bush holding the book My Pet Goat upside down in a children’s classroom. Even if ,as some has suggested, this is a product of Photoshop, the fact that it looks credible speaks volumes. I can visualise Barack reading more than just official circulars (the right way up) than Bush. It doesn’t mean that his politics are always right but it does signify that his brain cells are fully operational; quite a useful attribute for a president.

Meanwhile,in Britain, a recently report in The Guardian picked up on an interview with Lib Dem leader and Cameron collaborator Nick Clegg  gave to the women’s magazine Easy Living. In the original link to this piece, it refered to Clegg as a bookworm. The article itself revealed only that he likes to read a few pages of a novel before going to sleep to help him wind down at the end of a busy day. This doesn’t sound like my idea of a true bookworm.

Most of the great books are not going to send you off serenely into dreamland. One of the greatest novels of the last two decades is David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest which gets your mind buzzing rather than helping you to calm down.

One of the key themes of Wallace’s masterpiece is dependency. This is something ‘real’ bookworms can relate to since they have an obsession bordering on addiction; the need to read is as urgent as that of a long-term junky’s craving for the next fix. Without these regular ‘hits’ life just feels meaningless; reading fills this emptiness with structure and perspective.

And there’s a world of difference between a wise politician and a crafty opportunist. Clegg is one of the latter breed. He has made a devil’s pact with a Conservative party that is overseeing major cuts in library services. A genuine book addict would help block this state sanctioned hooliganism and be on the front line speaking in support of mice and men.

WordPress prompt : Osama bin Laden was killed. What will change, for you, for the U.S., for the world, now that Osama is gone? Or it will it not have much of an effect at all?

My initial response:

The good news is that Obama will almost certainly be be re-elected for a second term.

The bad news is that the so-called ‘war against terror’ can never be won.

I’m pleased Bin Laden is dead but the dancing in the streets looks premature and misplaced.

One tyrant is gone but it would be as well to remember that this is a fight  against a hydra-headed beast.

SHITGAZE GENERATION

blankdogs1eatskl1tnv2psychedelichorseshit1noage

shitgazeOne flipside of the wave of optimism that swept Obama to power is the view expressed in grandiose terms byTiny Mix Tapes to the effect that we live in an age conscious of “the impending sense of annihilation that pervades this particularly nebulous point in history”.

This dystopic (‘no we can’t’?) perspective seems more in tune with the so called ‘Shitgaze’ generation, children of no revolution but who are nevertheless fired up with a Punk spirit of DIY ethics and petulant disdain for all that is shiny, bright and clean. Continue reading