Tag Archive: Infinite Jest


That’s entertainment!

We are inundated by entertainment. Ingulfed, immersed, overwhelmed.

Even when we think we’ve had enough we demand and expect more. The line between truth and reality is blurred. This means that we are confused when real life intrudes: a terorist act, an act of God, a man-made disaster, an argument with a friend, a personal achievement. When any of these happens, a common comment is to say ‘It was just like a movie’.

What used to be the basis for speculative fiction are now daily occurences. There is no need for Science Fiction anymore. A TV presenter becomes President of the USA. A clean-cut dictator threatens to launch a nuclear attack. TV channels boast of being first at the scene of the latest horrific event.

A routine editorial remit is ‘If it bleeds, it leads’. Now that entertainment is so precisely tailored to personal tastes and individual fetishes, consumption becomes an end it itself. So preferable is this to ‘real life’ that it becomes no just an escape but an alternative reality. Welcome to the modern world.

videocallIn these lockdown days, the escalation of video calls on WhatsApp, Skype, Zoom etc and online team meetings, means that David Foster Wallace’s inspired piece on video telephony in ‘Infinite Jest’ has become highly topical. The whole section is hilarious and here is just a taste of what he had to say:

“Callers now found they had to compose the same sort of earnest, slightly overintense listener’s expression they had to compose for in-person exchanges. Those callers who out of unconscious habit succumbed to fuguelike doodling or pants-crease-adjustment now came off looking rude, absentminded, or childishly self- absorbed. Callers who even more unconsciously blemish-scanned or nostril-explored looked up to find horrified expressions on the video-faces at the other end. All of which resulted in videophonic stress.”

INFINITE JEST by David Foster Wallace (First published 1996)

infinite_notesInfinite Jest was written over two decades ago but is still remarkably topical in an age where the line between entertainment and ‘real life’ is increasingly blurred.

It is, by any standards, a big novel and a daunting proposition to all but the most dedicated reader. It stretches to 981 pages with a further 96 pages of footnotes to push it beyond the 1000 mark.

Footnote is probably a misnomer since many are more than just clarifications or references. One runs to 17 pages. This is not a novel you’d pick up lightly or cast aside easily (unless you wanted to do someone harm!). Continue reading

modernismSo far this year I have read two prize-winning ‘novels’ – The Sell Out by Paul Beatty (Man Booker) and The Sympathizer by Viet Thanh Nguyen (Pulitzer).

Both have been widely praised for their craft and cleverness. Both left me wondering what happened to good old-fashioned storytelling. These are driven by themes rather than plots, each with an unnamed narrator  respectively reflecting upon racism in America and perceptions of the Vietnam war.

The weightiness and worthiness of the topics is beyond doubt but masked by a knowing irony; neither author has any interest in a conventional narrative with a start-middle & end.

Far be it from me to knock the post-modernist slant of these works. As a worshipper of David Foster Wallace, I am fully aware that modern truths cannot always be told in a linear style but at the same time I find myself increasingly missing characters and plots.

I have come to realize just how many classics of English literature I know but have never read; for example Gulliver’s Travels and Robinson Crusoe. While re-reading Infinite Jest I now intend to plug these gaps. Pre-modernism here I come.

The walled-up limits of freedom

freedom-flagI read this passage today and, although it is from a book published in 1996, I was immediately struck by how topical it is. What do you think?:

“Always with you this freedom! For your walled-up country to shout ‘Freedom! Freedom!’ as if it were obvious to all people what it wants to mean, this word. But look: it’s not as simple as that. Your freedom is the freedom – from; no one tells your precious individual USA selves what they must do.[……..] What of freedom – to. How for the person to freely choose? How to choose any but a child’s greedy choices if there is no loving-filled father to guide, inform, teach the person how to choose? How is there freedom to choose if one does not know how to choose?”

pg 32o - Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace.