Tag Archive: UbuWeb


ALL ABOUT NOTHING

UbuWeb today turned me onto The Nothingists.

I had never heard of this Dadaist, NO! NO! , group from Russia .

This is not surprising when you learn that their nihilist manifesto was summed up by the slogans:

Write nothing!
Read nothing!
Say nothing!
Print nothing!

Their “Creative Bureau of Nothingists” sounds like it would have made a great Monty Python sketch and would be a good name for many political departments.

The Nothingists [Nichevoki] were short lived.

They formed in Moscow in 1919 and ceased all (in)activity in 1923.

Nothing more is known.

SILENCE. LECTURES AND WRITINGS BY JOHN CAGE (Marion Boyars Publishers Ltd, 2009)

718brsgdxzl._sx355_bo1204203200_I have just marked this book as ‘read’ on Good Reads but I confess that I have not read every word, sentence or line .

I doubt whether there are many that have.

This is a source book.

A book to dip into.

If you attempt to read it form beginning to end your brain will hurt.

This is not a story and there is nothing linear about the text.

John Cage was not a conventional musician and not a conventional thinker. He knew the limitations and possibilities of sound and the difficulty of explaining what music was and/or what it was for.

John Cage

John Cage

He wrote that “the way to get ideas is to do something boring”.

He didn’t pretend that his lectures  were interesting. His lecture on nothing comes with the warning:  “The text itself is repetitive and at times excruciatingly boring”.

Creativity is what happens between doing or thinking about something and nothing. It’s a Zen thing.

In Darling Boy (Beautiful Boy) John Lennon sang “Life is what happens to you while you’re busy making other plans”.

He begins his  Lecture on something: by saying : “This is a talk about something and naturally also a talk about nothing. About how something and nothing are not opposed to each other but need each other to keep on going”.

Opening text to Lecture On Nothing.

Opening text to Lecture On Nothing.

He begins his  Lecture on Nothing: by saying;  “I have nothing to say and I am saying it and that is poetry”

He liked asking questions but one of these was ‘Is it true there are no questions that are really important?”

The final talk in this collection is entitled ‘Where Are We Going? And What Are We Doing?‘ but don’t expect to find the answers in the text.

Many may regard this as pretentious and deliberately obtuse – two of many criticisms levelled at Cage.  It was suggested that Cage would shock people more if he gave a conventional talk, to which he replied : “I don’t give these lectures to surprise people but out of a need for poetry”.

He composed his talks like he was giving a musical performance so the timing of the delivery was often as important as the words. They were meant to heard and not read so the book attempts to replicate the character and shape of each lecture. For example, a lecture on ‘Indeterminacy’ is  written in extremely small type “in an attempt to emphasize the intentionally pontifical character of this lecture”.

It is not an easy read but it contains a wealth of ideas and it’s a book I continually pick up much as believers might pick up a bible looking for revelations or insights from a random choice of text.

The debt modern musicians owe to Cage is enormous even if they have never heard his music OR listened to / read his lectures.  His experiments with sound were dismissed as the actions of a lunatic but today samples, tape loops, field recordings, random noise , programmed beats and the use of ‘non musical’ instruments are commonplace.

As I said, the talks were meant to heard and Ubuweb has many valuable sound archives that illustrate the point. For instance it is interesting to compare two recordings of Lecture on Nothing.

One is performed by  Frances-Marie Uitti From the album  “Works for Cello; Lecture on Nothing”, (EtCetera Records, 1991)

The other is by Kaegan Sparks with ambient noises of Christian Marclay

THE ETHICS OF MUSIC SHARING

Back in the day, I was never convinced by the ‘home taping is killing music’ argument any more than I would subscribe to the view that home cooking is killing restaurants.

On the contrary, the fact that I taped countless albums borrowed from friends or my local library satisfied my ravenous musical appetite  and introduced me to countless artists I would never otherwise have heard of.  I certainly didn’t buy any less music as a result

I recognise that the MP3 revolution is a different kettle of fish and offers a flood of free temptations for music obsessives but,even so, l don’t think that file sharing is killing music either.

Napster cat

As  fellow addicts will know there is no limit to how many new sounds you can consume and there’s never a point where you say ‘I have enough music to listen to and don’t need more’.

The more you hear, the more you want to hear – it’s an itch that never goes away.

A man who understands this craving is the founder of UbuWeb, Kenneth Goldsmith who presents an intelligent perspective on this issue  in an article in this month’s Wire magazine. Continue reading