Tag Archive: Luis Bunuel


The heartless horror of Mother!

MOTHER! directed by Darren Aronofsky (USA, 2017)
mother1

Beware of films with exclamation marks in the title!

“Mother! is a movie designed to provoke fury, ecstasy, madness, and catharsis, and more than a little awe”.  This verdict is from a review in Vox that Darren Aronofsky says ‘gets it’.

It culminates in an apocalyptic finale that works on the theory that nothing succeeds like excess. It is shocking in the sense of being shockingly awful.

If Aronofsky’s goal was to get under my skin he succeeded but, while I usually gain a perverse pleasure from mindfuck or body horror movies, this one left me cold and with feelings of distaste and repulsion. Continue reading

BUÑUEL MEETS PYTHON

L’ Age d’Or / The Golden Age directed by Luis Buñuel (France, 1930)

review_lage_dorThis movie begins with stock footage of scorpions as if it were a natural history film. Captions give details about these predatory creatures, such as to tell us that “their pincers are instruments of aggression and information”. The desire to convey “aggressive information” could also be said to be a strong motivating factor for the two surrealists. Although serious targets were in their sights, there is plenty of evidence of a deliberately perverse sense of humour. An instinctive sense of the ridiculous and a defiance of logic mean that the movie could be viewed as a forerunner to the comic sketches of Monty Python’s Flying Circus.

Bunuel by Dali

For example, some captioned links like ” some hours later” and “sometimes on Sundays”, have the same contrived quality as the Python catchphrase ‘…and now for something completely different’. In addition, incongruous details like a cow in a bedroom or a horse and cart driving through a room full of well-heeled party goers take an almost childlike pleasure in mocking the sanitized politeness of bourgeois society. And there is also something John Cleese-like about the exaggerated anti-social behaviour of Gaston Modot as ‘the man’. This includes kicking a dog and a blind man, hurling abuse at passers-by and slapping the face of a countess for spilling his drink. His frustration appears to stem from thwarted attempts to make love to Lya Lys as The Young Girl. The impossibility of satisfying a simple desire would later become the central theme to Buñuel’s classic The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie. Though the couple remain fully clothed, their love scenes seem designed to provoke censors. for instance, the girl licking the toes of a statue blatantly suggests the act of fellatio.

crucifixAny doubt that religion is the prime target is dispelled by the closing sequences where we see a Christ-like figure leaving a sadistic orgy to the sound of tribal drumming and an image of a crucifix decorated with women’s scalps as jolly music plays. If ever there was a film that was made to be banned, then this is it. Salvador Dali and Buñuel could not realistically have expected official endorsement for the manner in which they show such wanton disrespect for bastions of the establishment and the catholic church in particular. It was made in 1930 and it was not until 1979 that it received formal premiere in the U.S. Better late than never.

VIRIDIANA directed by Luis Buñuel (Mexico/Spain, 1961)

Perhaps I should temporarily rename this blog ‘Buñuel My Soul’ as I’m currently immersed in the movie back catalogue of the great Spanish director.

Some of these I am watching for a second time but Viridiana is a new discovery.

As with many of his movies it has been widely branded as obscene and sacrilegious; accusations which Buñuel  would have regarded as compliments.

When it was first shown in Milan, the public prosecutor closed the cinema, impounded the reels and Buñuel was sentenced in absentia to one year in jail if he ever set foot in Italy.

Buñuel claimed disingenuously that he didn’t know what the fuss was about; wryly conceding that the Pope probably knew more about blasphemy than he did. Continue reading


Le journal d’une femme de chambre
,(Diary of a Chambermaid) directed by Luis Buñuel (France, 1964)

I am currently fixated on rediscovering the fascinating filmography of Luis Buñuel and the path back from The Discreet Charm Of The Bourgeoisie leads to Diary Of A Chambermaid.

This was the first of the Spanish director’s fruitful partnership with screenwriter Jean-Claude Carrière and the first of the French period of his final movies.

For lovers of surrealism it doesn’t offer many rich pickings as it tells the story in a relatively conventional manner.

It centres on a sophisticated Parisian chambermaid Célestine (Jeanne Moreau) who begins work for the Monteil household at a country château.  There she finds herself working for a fastidious and frigid wife and having to contend with this woman’s frustrated and frisky husband.

The most Buñuel-esque scene is that between Célestine and wife’s elderly father where the old man reveals a fetish for shoes. He gets her put on a pair of boots and has her hitch up her skirt so he can watch her walk around his room. When he is later found dead in his bed he is clutching these same boots so you are left to presume that the excitement proved too much.

The adaptation of Octave Mireau’s novel is otherwise rendered as a kind of dark fairy tale where the wolves are hairy on the inside and where the rise of European antisemeticism  is pointedly linked to the bigotry and hypocrisy  of  priests and the  middle classes.

This may be one of Buñuel’s minor works but it is fascinating all the same and well worth seeing for the subdued sensuality of Jeanne Moreau’s performance.

BUÑUEL’S LAST ACT OF OBSCURITY

Cet Obscur Objet Du Désir (That Obscure Object Of Desire) directed by Luis Buñuel (France/Spain, 1977)

There are plenty of films where women are badly treated by men but in this movie it is the man who is a victim of sorts and , like all the best farces, it has a tragic aspect.

Mathieu (Fernando Rey) has status, power and wealth, all of which gives him a sense of entitlement with a younger woman from a less privileged background.  He meets her when she is taken on as a new housemaid and it’s a case of lust at first sight. He invites her to bring a drink (an aphrodisiac!) to his room and immediately makes direct advances.

She wisely resists and the next morning he learns that she has packed and left without notice and giving no indication of a forwarding address. This first rejection sets the pattern for their unconsummated relationship. Continue reading