Tag Archive: Herman Melville


MOBY DICK directed by John Huston (USA, 1956)

220px-moby_dick434There’s is some dispute about screenwriter Ray Bradbury’s experience of Herman Melville’s epic novel. According to Wiki he confessed to John Huston that he’d never managed to get through the whole book, echoing the feelings of many readers, including me.

However, a strongly contradictory perspective is given by Philip Hoare. Writing in Leviathan, Hoare claims that Bradbury “read the book nine times and wrote fifteen hundred pages of script to reach a final one hundred and fifty”.

I suspect the truth may lie someway in between these two accounts. Huston is credited as co-writer and my gut feeling is that the director had a more intuitive grasp of the source material than the Sci-Fi author.

Either way, reducing the scope and complexity of the novel to a feature length film is a daunting and nigh on impossible task. Continue reading

LEVIATHAN – GOLIATHS OF THE DEEP

Cover of "Leviathan"

Cover of Leviathan

LEVIATHAN OR, THE WHALE by Philip Hoare (4th Estate, 2008)

The Natural History of the Sperm Whale by Thomas Beale was published in 1839, a work which Philip Hoare refers to as “a wide-ranging and eclectic work, part scientific study, part adventure story”.

This same description could easily apply to Hoare’s own study although you would need to add that it is also an extended appreciation of Herman Melville’s Moby Dick combined with a personal account of a lifetime’s fascination with water and whales.

Melville began writing his great American novel in 1850 and the timing of the work is seen by Hoare as significant for a number of reasons. Not only did it coincide with the period when the issue of slavery was coming to an end but he also believes whaling is a telling metaphor for America’s obsession with the wilderness and that Melville’s epic tale of Captain Ahab’s quest for the white whale therefore stands as a kind of “wild west of the sea”. Continue reading

BARTLEBY BLUES

BARTLEBY, THE SCRIVENER: A STORY OF WALL STREET a short story

A scrivener is the job of copying law papers, work which the narrator in Melville’s parable admits is a “dry, husky sort of business”.
The story is written from the point of view of an elderly copyist who owns a successful firm which employs two other clerks, Turkey and Nippers, and a 12-year-old office-boy, Ginger-Nut. These whimsical nicknames are at odds with these rather sad figures who earn their living in this drab line of work.

The story centres on Bartleby, a new addition to the staff who , at first,  appears a model worker – dedicated and conscientious. Gradually, the fact that he never leaves his desk, never seems to eat and doesn’t socialize mark him as an oddity.

Furthermore, whenever he is asked to do any additional jobs, he replies simply “I would prefer not to”.

In this way he stubbornly refuses to do anything other than his own allotted copying work without ever explaining why. He is an enigma who is described in the following terms : “pallidly neat, pitiably respectable, incurably forlorn…………. singularly sedate”.

The owner of the firm threatens to sack him but, out of pity, can’t quite bring himself to do so. Removing him by force seems to be the only way to get him out of the building.

The formality and procrastinating personality of the narrator is rendered in the heightened formality of Melville’s language: “I determined again to postpone the consideration of this dilemma to my future leisure”.

Eventually, out of desperation the ageing scribe decides it would be easier to move offices that move Bartleby and when the removal company has been and gone, this eccentric clerk remains as “the motionless occupant of a naked room”.

This narrator does not pretend to tell the whole story of this elusive figure; stating in his introduction “I believe that no materials exist for a full and satisfactory biography of this man”.

We can only speculate that Melville’s short story is intended as a kind of cautionary tale; a warning that if you end up stuck in a soul-destroying job you could become a nowhere man like Bartleby whose only recourse is to become a rebel in the sense defined by Albert Camus : “A man who says no”.