Tag Archive: Michael Fassbender


FISH TANK directed by  Andrea Arnold (UK, 2009)

fish tankAndrea Arnold’s bold debut movie was about a CCTV operator in Glasgow and in a strange way her brilliant follow up ,Fish Tank, is also about surveillance. Yet, while in Red Road the woman was on the outside looking in, the teenage protagonist of Fish Tank is on the inside looking out.

Mia is 15 and her life on a council estate in Essex is about as interesting and varied as that of a goldfish. Money is tight but the flat where she lives with her mother and younger sister, Tyler, is decent enough;  above all, hers  is a poverty of the soul.

Her mom is more interested in partying than parenting so Mia and Tyler have become pretty wild and unruly. Like many kids of this age (and I speak from experience as the father of a girl around the same age) Mia is emotionally confused and desperately needs to find a way out of what she perceives as a boring, dead-end existence.

School offers nothing and she is on the point of being expelled. You could say that she doesn’t do a lot to help make things better. She’s on the defensive even before she is directly criticised and gets violent and/or foul mouthed when crossed. Yet, her streetwise bearing and combative behaviour is mostly just a front.

Katie Jarvis got the part as Mia when a casting agent saw her having a row with her boyfriend at Tilbury railway station (one of the locations in the movie). She was cast for her attitude rather her acting experience; a risk that could easily have backfired but doesn’t as she manages to pull off the difficult feat of looking scary and sassy while also convincing us of her vulnerability. Continue reading

JANE EYRE: READER, I FANCIED HIM

JANE EYRE directed by  Cary Joji Fukunaga (United Kingdom, 2011)

jane-eyre-2011-promo-305

Who are you calling ugly?

In the title role, Mia Wasikowska is perfect in the part of the repressed young governess whose pureness of heart and straight talking melts the cold heart of her employer, Mr Rochester.

She looks exactly the right age (19) and every inch the plain Jane of Charlotte Bronte’s novel. Judi Dench is also faultless as the kind-hearted housekeeper Mrs Fairfax.

Screenwriter Moira Buffini sticks pretty closely to the novel complete with stilted dialogue, and director Cary Fukunaga does a good job at recapturing the bleakness of the Yorkshire Moors.

The undoing of the movie is in the male characters. Jamie Bell looks like Billy Elliot with whiskers but the most serious miscasting  is Michael Fassbender as Rochester.

Fassbender is a great actor but also very dynamic and good-looking.  In Bronte’s novel, Rochester is described as an imposing, barrel-chested man with grim features denoting character more than beauty.  Of their first meeting (when he falls off his horse), Jane as the book’s narrator confides to the reader:  “Had he been a handsome, heroic looking gentleman, I should not have dared to stand thus questioning him against his will”.  

In the movie, there’s no getting away from the fact that Fassbender looks both handsome and heroic which throws the whole story off-balance.  When Fassbender asks Jane. “Do you think me handsome?”, her emphatic negative would surely have the females in the cinema thinking ‘Are you blind, lady?’

HUNGER directed by Steve McQueen (2008)

I’ve been reading a lot about Steve McQueen’s new movie Shame which is released this week.  Pieces about the British born director usually include praise for his debut full length movie, Hunger, released in 2008 which also stars Irish-German actor Michael Fassbender .  While waiting for Fassbender the sex addict, I thought I’d watch him as the IRA hunger striker, Bobby Sands.

And what a remarkable performance it is. There can’t be many actors prepared to starve themselves almost to death to play a role but this is what he does in order to act out Sands’ final 66 days on earth. He embarked on a 10 week crash diet in LA which, by the end, had him surviving on just 600 calories a day. He ended up weighing  59 kg which was almost the same weight as that of Sands when he died and perilously close to the point of no return when your vital organs start giving up.

When you see shots of him with visible bones, the first thought is that this is a clever piece of Photoshop style trickery, but, when you realise he really looked like this, it is doubly shocking. Apparently, many people thought Fassbender was suffering from cancer and it’s amazing that he had sufficient energy to play the final scenes. To embark on such a no holds barred degree of commitment shows the level of belief must have had in McQueen’s movie. You wouldn’t  go through this self-torture for a second-rate production. Continue reading