Tag Archive: Facebook


THE RIGHT TO CAUSE OFFENCE

The offending image

The Malicious Communications Act 1988 is designed to “make provision for the punishment of persons who send or deliver letters or other articles for the purpose of causing distress or anxiety”.

Under this legislation, a 19-year-old man from Canterbury, England was arrested by Kent Police for uploading an image to Facebook of him burning a paper poppy on remembrance Sunday with the caption “How about that you squadey cunts?”. 

This demonstrates that this individual is a prize plonker who can’t spell (he should have written ‘squaddy or ‘squaddie”) but that’s not the issue here. Continue reading →

BLACK MIRROR : THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF YOU (Channel 4)

“…..and this is where I lost my virginity”.

Facebook’s much hyped Timeline app is fine and dandy if all you want to remember is “your memorable posts, photos and life events”.

The ideal digital lives are those of happy, shiny people living happy, shiny lives full of holiday adventures, warm friendships, perfect families and fulfilling careers.

While  I can understand the rush to share such positive experiences, real life (remember that?) has a nasty habit of casting shadows over sweetness and light.

Deaths of loved ones, getting sacked, divorced, cheated on, lied to or having periods of sadness, confusion and depression are not the kind of things I’d personally want on my interface.

But perhaps I’m not representative of current lifestyle trends. As daytime TV has shown, there is never a shortage of folks willing to air their dirty laundry in public; the internet merely provides a much larger outlet for such warts and all confessionals.

The way technology has rewired our perception of reality has been the theme of Channel 4’s excellent Black Mirror trilogy. The final instalment – The Entire History Of You – touches on some of the issues raised by Facebook’s new toy without referring to this or any other social network by name.

It envisages a near future where implanted microchips enable people to save and play back scenes from their lives – a kind of HD Timeline. The fictional advert promoting this device features a seductive voice assuring potential customers that  “memory is for living”.

I can think of many occasions when such a tool would have been useful to prove what someone did or didn’t say in the past but mostly the “I know what you said last Summer” scenario has more cons that pros.

So it proves for a “soon to be unemployed and unemployable lawyer” named Liam in the TV drama. Not only is his career on the rocks but he also suspects that his wife Ffion has revived an affair with a smug ‘friend’ named Jonas. Liam doesn’t believe her story that the amorous interest was confined to a one week fling before they were married. She hardly helps her case much when she says things like “not everything that isn’t true is a lie”.

Black_MirrorThe ability to rewind and review memories allows Liam to pick holes in her weak defence and to prove not only that her lapse was far more than just a “weird week”. Worse still, it raises the possibility that Jonas is the father of their child.

The Entire History Of You had many similarities with an episode of The Twilight Zone or could be a modern day Tale Of The Unexpected. Unlike the previous two Black Mirror episodes, it was not written Charlie Brooker but is the work of Jesse Armstrong; the co-creator of this year’s comedy-drama hit Fresh Meat.

It is the weakest of the three dramas because, despite the technological novelty aspects, it is essentially a retelling of an age-old story of marital infidelity and jealousy. The first two episodes were more original because they presented dystopian scenarios to show how the intrusions of the virtual world have created an entirely new set of moral dilemmas for humanity.

The drama does however prove the wisdom behind the lyrics to the popular hit The Way We Were : “Memories may be beautiful and yet , what’s too painful to remember, we simply choose to forget.”

INSIDE FACEBOOK

This sign says 'facebook'.

The last thing Facebook needs is more publicity but this is mainly what we get in the lame  one hour BBC documentary presented by Emily Maitlis.

When not displaying her range of chic leisure wear, Maitlis seems starstruck by being in the presence of Mark Zuckerberg. When she’s shown around the Facebook offices she is introduced to Zuckerberg’s chair : “that’s his hoodie” she gushes.

The ‘rare interview’ with the man itself is brief and unrevealing. He tells us how ‘cool’ and ‘awesome’ the social network is and doesn’t have to deal with any awkward questions.

She interviews colleagues and supporters and visits connected businesses. These all  confirm the awesomeness of Facebook .

Maitlis’s shallow analysis of what has made the company so popular includes telling us how easy it is the make friends and ‘like’ global companies (as if we didn’t know). Continue reading →

LONDON’S BURNING

Hard to believe the pictures on the BBC of riots in London, and beyond.

The first impressions is that this is not any genuine political protest and for commnentators like Nina Power in The Guardian to give legitimacy to the mindless thugs and opportunists engaged in this action is appalling.  It’s good to read that most of the comments to her piece are strongly critical of  her position.

Of course, it speaks of deep underlying social problems but divisions between haves and have nots are not new.

What is new is the means of communication between gangs and individuals out for kicks. “Word of mouth” now means Twitter, Facebook and texting which speeds up the escalation of the violence.

There is no logic to these actions as these rioters are essentially destroying the communities they live in.

All deeply sickening and very sad.

Link: Is Technology To Blame (BBC)

THE FRENCH BAN THE F-WORD

King Canute sets an example to the French.

Adopting words or phrases from other languages seems a natural process in which neither party to the exchange is harmed.

The government in France would, of course, argue otherwise and say death to ‘La différence’.

For example, the French establishment prefer ‘ordinateur’ to ‘computer and in 2003, it was decreed that  ‘courriel’ should be used instead of the English ‘e-mail’.

Now we learn that Facebook and Twitter should not be mentioned by name on radio or TV unless used directly in relation to a news story.

The official reason given is that using these terms constitutes an act of advertising and as such contravenes the 1992 decree which legislates against the promotion of commercial enterprises.

The F-word can no longer be used and Tweeting broadcasters can now only plug their sites only by a broad reference to the social networks.

Personally, I’m not a big fan of either of these new web-based institutions but both have become so ubiquitous that I find it hard to believe that such a ban of referring to them by name is logical or even workable.

I wonder how much this decision by France’s Conseil Supérieur de l’Audiovisuel is motivated by linguistic questions rather than  an attack on so-called ‘clandestine advertising’.

Those who approve of the French action are those who are irritated by hearing media folk asking to be ‘liked’ or ‘followed’ on these two infotainment hubs. I have some sympathy for this position but  making only a veiled reference to Facebook and Twitter is not going to make them go away. Like it or not they are here to stay.

Frankly, the French policy that is as likely of success as King Canute’s attempt to turn back the ocean’s tide.