Archive for October, 2012


Not even the church in L’Aquila could be saved after a devastating earthquake struck in 2009.

It’s only human nature that when there is damage, destruction and death we look for someone to blame and vainly seek assurances that such a thing will never happen again.

So when there’s a natural disaster, what insurance companies call an ‘act of God’, we should all point skywards accusingly exclaiming ‘why has thou forsaken us?’ or words to that effect.

The buck should stop with the deity but we know by now that s/he moves in mysterious ways and remains a hidden and, I would argue, non-existent presence. Continue reading

KEEPING MY FEET ON THE GROUND

NOVEL ON YELLOW PAPER by Stevie Smith (first published by Jonathan Cape in 1936)

Stevie Smith coverStevie Smith is more acclaimed as a poet than as a novelist and now I know why.

When I start reading a book I hate abandoning it but this rambling ‘novel’ defeated me half way in.

I may have given up even sooner but for a clever stunt on her part on page 25 where she writes the following:

“I will give a word of warning. This is a foot-off-the ground novel that came by the left hand. And the thoughts come and go and sometimes they do not quite come and I do not pursue them to embarrass them with formality to pursue them into a harsh captivity. And if you not a foot-off-the-ground person I make no bones to say that is how you will write and only how you will write. And if you are a foot-on-the-ground person, this book will be for you a desert of weariness and exasperation. So put it down. Leave it alone. It was a mistake to get this book. You could not know”.

Now, prior to reading this I had never even heard tell of foot-on/off-the-ground people but in this context I take it that ON is bad and OFF is good.

I assume that to be OFF is to be open to loose strands and open-ended threads, to not be irritated by a “talking voice that runs on”. Being ON is to be literal-minded, straight and, by strong implication, a boring stick in the mud.

Her challenge is there in the novel’s ” work it out for yourself” subtitle and the back page blurb offers another warning by quoting The Times Literary Supplement’s praise for the “Shandyesque digressions”.

Not wanting to be one of the blinkered readers who expect a start, middle and end (in that order) I did persevere but had to will myself to concentrate in a vain attempt to follow an author with a saucy wit but no concept at all of what makes a coherent novel.

It purports to be the voice of bored secretary (Pompey) but reads more like random autobiographical musings in which sexual liberty and independent thinking are celebrated but where she follows a train of thought without giving much any real reason why the reader should go there with her.

Life’s too short and I set it aside with a sense of relief.

Now I just have to live with the fact that I’m officially a foot-on-the-ground person.

GOODFELLAS : KEEPING IT IN THE FAMILY

Say ‘cheese’!  L to r – Henry, Johnny, Paulie and Tommy.

GOODFELLAS directed by Martin Scorsese (USA, 1990)

To Henry Hill (Ray Liotta) you’re either a shmuck or a somebody. There is no middle way. The former are those who have “shitty jobs with bum pay checks”, the latter are gangsters, wiseguys and “movie stars with muscle”.

Being part of the exclusive club of these ‘goodfellas’ is to be part of a family, albeit a very violent one. They adhere to a code of ethics which includes being nice to their moms and never ratting on your friends, but the work also requires hands on experience of intimidation and murder.

The perks of the job are that you dress well, drive swanky cars, get laid a lot and,provided you give tips to the right people, you are practically above the law. Continue reading

There must be some worried star names at the BBC right now in the light of the ongoing crisis surrounding paedophile and rapist Jimmy Saville.

Another DJ who is being accused beyond the grave is John Peel but to imply that his past misdemeanours are comparable to the cynical abuse carried out by Savile is farcical.

Peel admitted that he had sex with young girls and joked fairly salaciously that he never asked for ID. This prompted Julie Burchill to write a savage article about him while he was still alive. I strongly disagree with Burchill on this but it has to be admitted her rage against the hypocrisies within male dominated institutions now sounds very topical. Continue reading

JACQUE TATI’S CIRCLE GAME

PLAYTIME directed by Jacques Tati (France, 1967)

With all the plate glass windows in this movie it’s only a matter of time before someone mistakes one for an open doorway. It’s a gag waiting to happen but Jacques Tati is more interested in taunting the audience and playing with their expectations than giving them the payoff too quickly.

He also does this by having other actors adopt the Monsieur Hulot look of half mast trousers, suede shoes, Argyle socks, beige mac, trilby hat , pipe and umbrella. This leads to several instances of mistaken identity while the real Hulot is confined to something akin to a cameo role.

This reflects the fact that Tati was feeling boxed in by the success of his popular creation. Rather than rest on his laurels, he wanted his comedy to be more challenging.

He therefore dispenses with a predictable storyline in favour of a movie where the theme of  modernity is in lieu of any actual plot. As in Mon Oncle, sophisticated technology is shown as making relatively simple tasks more complicated and only serve to create more barriers to meaningful communication.

The result of  Tati’s adoption of a more experimental approach in Playtime is a movie that was posthumously hailed as a masterpiece but all but bankrupted him during his lifetime. The paying public failed to be sufficiently impressed by the elaborate sets, which came to be known as ‘Tativille’, or the meticulously choreographed scenes. They came to the cinema to be entertained and left feeling cheated. Continue reading